Paweł Piskorz pisze:
> Gregbike pisze:
>> Paprotka będzie doskonała gdyż pochłania promieniowanie jonizacyjne
>> z monitora... Zaleca się stosowanie jak największej ilości paprotek
>> wokół stanowiska komputerowego, zwłaszcza z monitorami CRT.
>
> Podobno świetnie przy tym rosną ;]
| In June 1990 a horrifying campaign of harassment was initiated in London by
| what are believed to be elements of the security services. The harassment has
| continued for over five years, starting from the broadcast and print media,
| and encompassing abuse through set-up situations and by people in public
| places. It has been brought to the attention of the police and they are aware
| what is happening, but are not taking any action to prevent it.
corley, you puzzle me!
i've narrowed your possible motives down to one or more of the following:
1) you work on behalf of the british government with a hidden agenda of
furthering the largely right wing (most to hide) censorship brigade's
cause, "a drug-crazed psycho posting dangerous nonsense - how very very
sad - but in the public interest,we must act." draft internet (censorship)
bills rolling off hm govt's banders at this very moment, i don't doubt it!
2) you work for the daily mail which has started to feel the "internet
pinch" as it suddenly clicks in the chronically adled minds of yet more and
more of their readers - that shudder-inducing realisation that the entire
editorial staff at the mail are scaremongering, imbecilic, blood-leeching ,
totalitarian twats - can any else sense a coordinated campaign on its way
??- "Mail urges (their) government to act - internet safety endangered by
uncontrolled surfing lunatics - boys hands blown off by internet maniacs -
net porn responsible for 392323rd rape " .net porn responsible for
392324th rape " .net porn responsible for 392325th rape " .net porn
responsible for 392326th rape " .net porn responsible for 392327th rape "
net porn responsible for 392328th rape " .net porn responsible for
392329th rape " .net porn responsible for 392330th rape " .net porn
responsible for 392331st rape " .net porn responsible for 392332nd rape "
net porn responsible for 392333rd rape " .net porn responsible for
392334th rape " .net porn responsible for 392335th rape " .net porn
responsible for 392336th rape " .net porn responsible for 392337th rape "
net porn responsible for 392338th rape " etcetera, straight from the old
nag's mouth..
lee-potter (and english), take particular note.. (how ever you two common
********* managed to avoid encarceration for what was, quite
evidently,wilful contempt of court in the regina v taylforth & knights
case, is frankly beyond me.. those dreaded and now all too familiar words
"endemic corruption" were muttered by at least one Q.C.
>3) you (at least) believe there's (some) substance to your claim(s) and you
>have a genuine axe to grind. If so, bloody well go for it, but scrape the
>heavy layer of steaming dung off the czołówka (that's assuming you're even
>capable of distinguishing fantasy from reality.)
4) you (as an email address) are serving as some bizarre "educational"
programme orchestrated by the psychiatric industry - ever keen to justify
enforced electrical lobotomies, electroshock and dwugs .All poised for the
echo? - "corley frigging well needs lobotomising"
5) you're just clinically insane with absolutely no comprehension or
insight into the consequences you will possibly face as a result of
repeatedly posting what, certainly on the face of it, looks like complete
and utter bullshit.
6) you're some weirdo prankster(s) - probably a group of student
psychiatrists having a cheap crack whilst high as kites on pilfered
dihydrocodeine.
7) You are infact working for the ss yourself, gauging public awareness of
the extent and methods of bugging - infinity transmitters, microwave
surveillance devices, satellite tracking equipment, 'chipping' of black
crims, say no more.
8) You're fuelling the central usenet administration committee, who, it is
believed, are keen to see the introduction of a wide-reaching framework of
self-created powers relating to posting cancellation. (see the 'son of
RFC1036')
my bet's on (5) - but just fuck off corley- irritate the lard-arsed canucks
instead. The cia's financing of "professor" cameron's brain-washing
experiments in montreal.. would be a good starting point ... or perhaps
"professor" watts and his widely admired masterful double eye-jabbing trick
- a couple of wallops with an icepick. such a waste of perfectly edible
four year old hispanics !!!!.. Perhaps the old marylebone rd posse could
fill us in with a few more facts on this one...?? You are all on the .net
now ????? A very warm welcome :-) ... christmas rapidly approaching..
>business booming?? Do we all get a look in at flotation ??!!
Actually, upon thinking about Mike's story it reminds me of someone oraz
heard about who suffered from a persecution copmlex. He was an immigrant
from some Eastern Bloc country who believed that 30 years after he
emigrated the KGB were still after him. He would blame them if he
had difficulty unlocking his car for instance (he reckoned they were
putting something into the locks!).
Something is very wrong, probably in Mike's head but what the hell,
loonies make life more fun! From: "TMK" <tamara_k[]poczta.onet.pl> Subject: Re: Strony internetowe do rejestracji Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:15:52 +0200
Użytkownik "Artur Muszyński" napisał w
wiadomości news:fb3ffp$tfe$1@mx1.internetia.pl...
> szomiz pisze:
>> Mozna ich zabic wlasna bronia - rozpoczac akcje masowego zglaszania stron
>> www. A pozniej skarzyc opieszalosc procedury.
>
> A jak się to robi? W jakim urzędzie? Co mi szkodzi, mam możliwość swoją stronkę
> firmową rejestrować, gdzie sobie wyłącznie życzą.
>
> artur
Tak? a nie zapytałeś ile taka rejestracja kosztuje? Jest bezpłatna?
TMK From: Konrad Kosmowski <konrad[]kosmosik.net> Subject: Re: Kursy PHP? Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:42:28 +0200
** Artur Muszyński wrote:
>> Nie. Powinien najpierw zacząć od teorii (algorytmów oraz baz danych), a dopiero
>> mając jako następujące pojęcie zacząć pisać kod.
> Kiedy się uczyłeś od matematyki, to pani zaczęła od "dwa jabłuszka oraz dwa
> jabłuszka...", czy od "dane jest ciało z operatorami..."?
Porównanie zupełnie z dupy bo matematyka jest z założenia przedmiotem ciasno
teoretycznym. Uczenie się programowania w konkretnym języku to nie są absolutne
podstawy matematyki.
Ale idąc tym tropem to wspaniale potwierdziłeś moje tezy, najpierw uczysz się
dodawać, a dopiero później rozwiązywać skomplikowane równania.
Dokładnie tak samo jest z programowaniem. Najpierw uczysz się podstawowych
"działań" w sferze właśnie teoretycznej (np. wierze Hanoi), a dopiero później
starasz się je przenosić na konkretny język programowania żeby rozwiązać
konkretne problemy.
ZANIM się zacznie cokolwiek programować trzeba wiedzieć co to jest algorytm, co
to są struktury danych, co to jest złożoność obliczeniowa etc.
Bo to są zagadnienia OGÓLNE nie związane z konkretnym językiem programowania.
On 25 Lis, 14:25, porneL wrote:
>
> Ale oraz tak mo=BFna u=BFywa=E6 tego w spos=F3b kompatybilny ze wszystkimi, n=
p.
> zamiast:
>
> overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: scroll;
>
> u=BFy=E6:
>
> overflow:auto; overflow-x: hidden;
>
> W ten spos=F3b na przegl=B1darkach niekumaj=B1cych overflow-xy przynajmnie=
j nic
> si=EA nie utnie.
Ok, dzi=EAki za info, szkoda =BFe nie uda=B3o si=EA rozwi=B1za=E6 drugiego
problemu ze strza=B3eczkami przewijania, nie ukrywam, =BFe na tym bardziej
mi zale=BFy :)