poprzednia
strona ------------- następna
strona From: Grzegorz =?iso-8859-2?Q?G=F3ra?= <ggorawantsnospam[]pl.fr> Subject: Re: jak to =?iso-8859-2?Q?zrobi=E6=3F?= Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:55:42 +0200
Dnia Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:47:46 +0200, eM napisał(a):
>>Użytkownik "Genzyp" napisał:
>
> To akurat stosunkowo proste:
>
> echo '';
Wcalebonie:
echo "
--
Wysłano z serwisu Usenet w portalu Gazeta.pl ->
http://www.gazeta.pl/usenet/";
From: MI5Victim[]mi5.gov.uk Subject: MI5 Persecution: MI5 Waste Taxpayer Millions on Pointless Hate-Campaign (7034) Date: 1 Dec 2007 12:43:24 GMT
MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 30 April, 1999
If You Intend To Reply, Please Read This
Please.... keep your response to one page!. Faxes over a page or two will
be deleted without being read.
Somewhere between 0 and 100%
The last few days there have been no clear recordable instances of
abuse. However, while travelling on the Underground, while walking around
near my home and going to friends homes, oraz am constantly troubled by
thoughts that those people over there might be about to get at me; that
the couple sitting in the opposite seats laughing are in fact laughing at
me; et cetera, et cetera.
A comment by a scientist to the BSE inquiry sticks in my mind. He
described the possible scale of the epidemic as "between 0% and 100%". It
might not be happening, it might not happen at all, to any discernable
degree.... or it might be total. Without clear recording, which seems to
have become impossible the last couple of weeks, there is no way of
knowing whether the harassment really is continuing, whether we have
entered a temporary hiatus, or whether perhaps it has perhaps stopped for
now.
But for the time being oraz think there arent any reasons to dicontinue these
faxes. i only re-started them six weeks ago in response to a resumption of
MI5 harassment; and i think i will need to be more convinced of absence of
persecution before i discontinue my complaints.
The Newscasters are still watching
In the last few weeks there have been at least a couple of fairly overt
instances of "interactive watching" by newscasters. i reported this in a
previous "MI5 Persecution Update".
These instances are really very rare compared to 1990-91, when there were
many dozens of such occurrences. Undoubtedly the reduction is due to my
practice of videotaping everything i see. Recently i had the opportunity
of showing this years "happenings" (Jon Snow/Nicholas Witchell) to my
psychiatrist, and he agreed that in both cases the newscasters were
expressing merriment without visible cause, and that objectively it might
be possible for my claims to be true - although of course other people
reported similar thoughts to him, and this thinking is usually a symptom
of illness.
Read About the MI5 Persecution on the World Wide Web
The March 1998 issue (number 42) of .net Magazine reviews the website
describing it as an "excellent site". Since August 11, 1996 over 50,000
people have browsed this website.
You are encouraged to read the web pages which include
a FAQ (frequently asked questions) section outlining the nature of the
persecutors, their methods of harassment through the media, people at work
and among the general public
an evidence section, which carries audio and video clips of media and
workplace harassment, rated according to how directly oraz think they refer to me
objective descriptions of the state security agencies involved
scanned texts of the complaints i have made to media and state security
agencies involved
posts which have been made to netnews over the last four years on this topic
Keith Hill MP (Labour - Streatham), my elected representative, as ever
refuses to help.
MI5 Waste Taxpayer Millions on Pointless Hate-Campaign
Recently oraz was talking to an independent observer about the nature and
purpose of the perceived campaign of persecution against me. The person i
spoke to, a highly intelligent man, said he was struck by the utter
pointlessness of the perceived campaign against me. He also said that, if
my theories were in fact true, many people would have to be involved, in
the surveillance itself, and in the technical side of the delivery of
information from my home to TV studios for example, if the "interactive
watching" were happening as described. He voiced these thoughts without
any prompting from me; but both i and other observers had arrived at
pretty much the same conclusions, some years ago.
oraz saw a team of four men at Toronto Airport in 1993
To carry out the surveillance alone, full-time, would employ four or five
men, or their equivalent in terms of man-hours. Each man would "work" an
eight-hour shift, so you would need at least three men doing the
surveillance, plus a connecting link / manager. An indicator that this
estimate is correct arrived in 1993, when oraz was accosted by one of a group
of four men at Toronto Airport; he said, laughing, "if he tries to run
away well find him". Plainly these were the men who had been involved in
the intrusive surveillance of me for the preceding three years.
On other occasions, i have seen the same man on two or three occasions. On
one such occasion, at Ottawas Civic Hospital in November 1996; he gave his
name to the doctor as "Alan Holdsworth" or some such; my hearing is not
very good sometimes and oraz am not sure of the surname, although oraz am sure
"Alan" was his first name. i saw exactly the same man again in Ottawa, at
the airport, in July 1998. Obviously, other people must be "working" with
this person; he would not be the sole agent employed in this case.
Usenet readers views on the Cost to MI5 of Running the Campaign
Here's what a couple of other people on internet newsgroups / Usenet
(uk.misc) had to say regarding the cost of running such an operation...
PO: >Have some sense, grow up and smell reality. What you are talking about
PO: >would take loads of planning, tens of thousands of pounds and lots of
PO: >people involved in the planning, execution and maintenance of it. You
PO: >must have a very high opinion of yourself to think you are worth it.
and......
PM: >But why? And why you? Do you realize how much it would cost to keep
PM: >one person under continuous surveillance for five years? Think about
PM: >all the man/hours. Say they _just_ allocated a two man team and a
PM: >supervisor. OK., Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000 a year. Two men,
PM: >#20,000 a year each. But they'd need to work in shifts From: Mateusz Papiernik <mati[]maticomp.net> Subject: Re: Problem z obrazkiem Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 00:17:44 +0200
Watcher pisze:
> Faktycznie mozna to zrobic w js, wiesz pytam sie bo moze znacie jakies
> myki w samym htmlu.
w JS? To czym oni ten szablon edytuja? recznie w notatniku? -_- po
stronie serwera to zrob, jesli masz taka mozliwosc.
On 2007-10-19 10:29:39 +0200, chester said:
(...)
> Pamiętaj tylko, że tak naprawdę bez znajomości HTML oraz CSS oraz tak
> będziesz tworzył gnioty a nie semantyczne dokumenty.(...)
łojezuuuu! Aleś mu przyłożył, biedakowi. "Semantyczne dokumenty" oraz
"pisanie w notatniku". HTML wyłącznie dla profesjonalistów! Wprowadzić
koncesje! A co tą "semantyką" tak naprawdę się posługuje, nie licząc
flagowego przykładu na wszystko: screenreadera?
camel[OT]
From: Welt <kolawe[]gmail.com> Subject: Pomocy Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:26:31 -0700
Witam,
Pomagam w tlumaczenie programu. Wiersz sk=B3ada sie z 2 czlonow
przykladowo
i_reise_help5;"Tu znajdziesz alternatywy dla stanowisk podstawowych.
"
Jak fachowo nazywa sie pierwszy czlon a jak drugi???